Customers, users, & independent comments....
Comments appearing below are from persons who have no connection whatever with the company nor any of its employees. The company does not necessarily endorse or agree with third party comments appearing below.
Best wishes
Moderator Group: Moderators Posts: 208 Joined: 3-February 07 From: USA Member No.: 4,080 |
QUOTE(Lighthouse @ Mar 26 2007, 03:48 AM)
Seen one and spoke to an owner. Impressive. Worth a look. The cost, output, and maintenance requirements, seem a reasonable alternative to some other systems. They have addressed all of the issues, have good answers, and a good KISS design, and optional hand pump for use in a life raft although the guy didn`t have that accessory so I have not seen that. |
Transatlantic ARC:
| Bavaria 40 |
|
|
General comments on all equipment: No failures. The most useful piece of equipment on board was the Honda generator, second was the Waterlog watermaker, third was the second genoa and second pole, and finally then there were the three buckets carried on board, they are simple but indispensible.
| Subject: | to waterlog |
| Date: | 03/11/2006 16:45:10 GMT Standard Time |
Hello Waterlog
I am Oeytstein. Sorry, my english is not so good.
In april last year, i bought an Waterlog 100 from you.
I am on my circumnavigation around the globe.
Until now, I have been sailing from Norway and down to tha Canary Islands. I
have used the waterlog all time. It is great!! It produce a very tastefull
and good water, excellent!!
But, there is one thing that i don`t like. The
outer rubber cover on the hose is “cracked” I will in this mail send you a picture
of this.
I hope you can take a look at this soon. Because I am leaving the Canary Islands
in the end in this month.
Have a nice day.
Best regards from Oeystein
| Subject: | Re: Your watermaker |
| Date: | 23/10/2006 19:44:58 GMT Daylight Time |
03-10-06
16/08/06
Hello,
We
got waterlog 18 months ago. We just used the waterlog again between
Lisbona and
Regards
Dbosiu
8/8/06
Dear Sirs
We require mor information about sterilizing our watermaker please. It will be appreciated if you will come back to us ASAP on this. We got our waterlog in May last year and have used it up to 160 nautical miles per day and are very pleased with the water it produces - it is much preferable to our ships tanks in fact.
Dr. F (U.K.)
| Subject: | shipment arrived! |
| Date: | 23/06/06 20:45:51 GMT Daylight Time |
Hello to ALL,
The parcel arrived with the sterization kit, and spare
parts. FedEX did in two days what the US Postal Service was able to do in
two months, nine days.
Thanks for all your help, perhaps red tape will subside. All thes new
beauro's with all thier low pay/scale clerks are causing quite a bit of
havoc in our daily lives. :-)
The watermaker works well, well designed and well constructed.
Stan :-)#
==============
20/06/06
`I got my watermaker 7 weeks back and used it for the first time this week in very salty water. I am pleased to say that it makes good water. Can you advise me of the cost of a spare ring screw as I do not appear to have it now.
S.Gillard.
=================
Extract from page 38 of Thesis: DR. Murray Thompson, Loughborough University
(http://www-staff.lboro.ac.uk/%7Eelmt/Murray%20Thomson%20Thesis.pdf)
A rather different form of reverse osmosis, worthy of mention for its sheer
elegance of its design, is the Waterlog (www.waterloginternational.com accessed:
March 04). This is a device that can be towed through the sea behind a sailing boat. It
has a water turbine that operates a pump that feeds an RO membrane. The towline is
hollow and carries the freshwater back to the boat.
===============
To: Waterlog
We received our
watermaker today; with great joy - looks lovely and works well!
We would like to thank everyone for their
efficiency. Somewhere in shipping, the forward leading edge of (one side) the
Hydroplane was bent on one corner. What is the best way to strighten the
forward leading edge back out? Once again we would like to say THANK
YOU !!!!
Bob
>
| Subject: | New Part |
| Date: | 15/11/05 19:48:33 GMT Standard Time |
Mike,
Just to let you know that I got the part!! The only thing
missing is the
water tube. I’m going to the hardware store now to try and fit a poly tube,
should it just slip in the hole? Well, call if you need to, otherwise the
unit seems to turn very freely and the foil’s move free as well.
Thanks again,
Rich
==========
Mike,
I really do apologize for all the trouble this has turned out to be. How
ever, still I need to cross the Gulf Steam tomorrow about 04:30, I don’t
know of any address to where I’m going until I get there. In the mean time,
I have no water maker! I think we’ve both done all possible things to get a
working unit again, but this is out of both our hands at this time. I would
like to hear from you today, as to my departure tomorrow AM. I’ll have no
cell phone, so communication will need to be by email. So, please get back
to me ASAP.
I’m going down to the Miami Post Office for the last time this morning in
hopes the package is there. If I do receive it I’ll email you.
Thank you again,
Dick
==========
I have inherited a watermaker in buying a boat. The
previous owner was well pleased with it and it all appears complete and works ok
but there
are no instructions. Can you let me have the owners manual (by Email?) Thanks,
John Dennis
Subj: RE: Your watermaker
Date: 27/06/05 17:12:11 GMT Daylight Time
To: Waterlogenquiry@aol.com
File: image001.jpg (3430 bytes) DL Time (49333 bps): < 1 minute
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Thank you for this quick answer. OK now.
André
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Waterlogenquiry@aol.com [mailto:Waterlogenquiry@aol.com]
Enviado el: lunes, 27 de junio de 2005 16:01
Asunto: Your watermaker
Dear Dr. Thir,
The manual in French langauge is at:
www.waterloginternational.com/manualf.htm
(If this live link does not work in your browser, please copy it and paste it into your address bar at the top of your screen)
Please forgive our French Langauge Translation - it may not be very good and it may not be the most recent version, however, all the points you need are discussed there.
There are a number of small differences such as the recirculation tube referred to in the French Manual is no longer used as it was not necessary. To steralize your unit, follow the instructions on the waterproof card packed with your Waterlog in box number "2 of 2".
To understand how to fit your watermaker to your boat, see this:

There is also a video of attaching the watermaker to the vessel at:
www.watermakers.ws/videocarbine.htm
Hope this answers your question
|
|||||
Hello Jenny,
I would like you to send me the motor please. I have been delayed in leaving Australia for a cruise on the yacht. I am very pleased with the performance of the watermaker to date, and I am also looking forward to having the complete kit while I enjoy the tropics.
Could you please post it to the address below.
Thank you so much for responding.
John
|
||||||||||
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your very informative email and prompt reply. Yes, looking at it, you
are right I have a problem with the hydroplanes as they are fixed solid with salt and
do not adjust themselves. I will wash & dismantle and free them off somehow. Fresh water should do it.
We are currently in the Galapagos and will be leaving in a couple of
days on a four week passage to the Marquesas. Then I`ll get water again!
Regards,
Tom
|
||||||||||
N. Zealand
|
||
List of the contributions: Jamy, the 6-04-2005
Who connait Waterlog which is a desalinisator who produces water thanks to the speed of the boat. Somebody it really tested in practice. This a good machine when one has very little water tank. Thank you for your answers.
List of the contributions: Patrice, the 10-04-2005 Jamy, I have one of them... to answer your question: I have model 200 with 5 nodes it generates between 3 and 6 liters of fresh water per hour, bigger than 6 nodes it goes up on the surface and the output falls (someone said he did a heavy iron on the line to fix his boat of speed) There is a larger model (the 300 I believe) who would probably have been indicated better in my case, but I think it a bargain. It is necessary that the sea is not agitated too much; the setting up with water is simple but it is necessary to handle with care the machine in the cockpit and it does not ask that to run up against your leg bone! With your health!
J.B. Australia 11/03/05
Thanks for coming back to me re the overdue delivery of the 12v motor I ordered. I would appreciate an update on the position ASAP as we will be needing it for the times we expect to be lying to anchor for longer periods in the future. Otherwise, I think that our Waterlog was an excellent investment as it produces the water we need and keeps the tanks full. I have to say that when our two teenagers aboard I do watch the amount of water that they use though.
|
||
I met a neighbour who has his (other!) boat in the carib. He has one (the 300 version I think). he spoke very highly of it. The downside is that, yes, you need to keep moving to generate water. The Waterlog website talks about 3.8knots being the water-producing minimum. They also provide an optional 12v motor to produce water when becalmed or at anchor. |
|
||||||||
Hi Margaret,
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||
|
Margaret Lawlor
Product Support
Waterlog International
I recently received my refurbished Waterlog 100 from you, and I thank you for the prompt turn-around from the time I dropped it off.
Unfortunately the refurbish amount shown by the invoice (£392.31) and billed to my credit card ($728.15) exceeded the refurbish cost that your web-site displayed and which you confirmed by email (see text below). I know that postage was part of the overrun, but would you be so kind as to provide the details that led to the amount that I was billed and that was charged to my credit card.
Sincerely,
John
Cunningham
| slrman Charter Member Member # 2592 |
How about a watermaker that costs less than most, uses no electricity or fuel, makes up to 40 gallons a day, and requires no installation? I have seen these in person and they look to be very well made and simplicity itself to maintain and use. http://www.waterloginternational.com From user reports, it seems it takes them a little while to get started and it may slow your boat about 1/4 knot. A small enough price for energy-free water while offshore. They also have an electric drive kit, but I am not sure why you'd need it. -------------------- Living in João Pessoa, Brazil. The best climate in the world and a great sailing location. |
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Am very interested in your product. Herewith order a 100 series. Saw one on a customers boat. Looks to be very simple in construction, and less to go wrong. We are a marine repair company and have many times had to sort desalinators leaks, electrical problems, pumps, etc., and this would be a great tool on every boat including my own.
Regards Kim
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 10:04 AMSubject: Re: my waterlog
Paul,
Your feedback was incredibly helpful. Thank you so much for taking the time to answer my questions.Everything is working O.K. now.
Larry
|
||||||||||
E-mail to the editor of Cruising Helmsman Magazine (Australia):
|
||||||||||
They did.
Well done Waterlog .
Forum comments from around the world
The following postings are taken a random from fora appearing on the Internet and are, no doubt, a very small proportion of total postings on the subject of Waterlog watermakers. It is believed that these postings represent a fair reflection of the overall view of the majority of the posters. It is reasonable to observe that fora, by their nature, are a conduit more for complaint and skepticism than positive comment on goods and services. As Waterlog uses no electricity, and accordingly has re-written the rule book on desalination, it has naturally drawn a hail of protest and criticism from those whose interests lie in maintaining the status quo in the Industry and maintenance trades.
Note: Postings in forums sometimes can be helpful, however, they must be treated with suspicion as most posts are:
1/ Normally personal opinions - frequently devoid of any basis in fact.
2/ Are often written by persons who know little or nothing about the subject on which they write. Sometimes postings can be wholly misleading.
3/ Frequently, persons post information which is wholly incorrect, mischievous, and sometimes malicious, motivated by their own commercial or other hidden agenda.
4/ A forum is never a medium for balanced judgment. We are all willing to complain vociferously and instantly, about persons, goods or services, however, do we rush to our keyboard to write to the media praising a service or product that is excellent? Seldom, if ever !
5/ In the case of forums dealing with cruising topics, those who are lucky enough to live the dream and are best qualified to comment are already cruising and are much less likely to frequent the discussion pages.
Often the most prolific posters are those who are at sitting at home, have time on their hands, and are sometimes least qualified to offer opinions and advice on oceanic matters. It must be noted that it is estimated that some 83% of postings on yachting related public forums are by people who do not own a boat.
Cruising Discussions: Waterlog Watermakers
By doug on Wednesday, October 10,
2002 - 10:18 pm:
I just saw an advertisement for "Waterlog" watermakers that are towed behind the boat, require no installation and no electricity. Would appreciate input on these. Has anyone out there tried one?
After researching the subject of alternative power generating, my understanding of the three passive methods, ie wind, water, solar, the waterlog is by far the most efficient. Keep in mind that it can also be used when at anchor, especially in a river or during tidal changes. some models can also be used as the generating unit for wind as well as water.
Towed water powered watermaker- Doug, We got one earlier this year and so far
are very impressed (lets hope it stays that way!) and for about $1400 it gives
us all the water we need, although we dont waste the stuff. Its well made,
compact, looks million dollars and is the cheapest watermaker of all. No contest
(so far) in our view. We found it in Google search engine when we were
researching "yacht watermakers". Fair winds. Dave
By marc Gershil on Sunday, October 14,
2002 - 07:13 am:
Hi, the web site is http://www.yachtwatermaker.com/
Marc
By Marc
Gershel on Sunday, October 14, 2002 - 07:23 am:
Dave,is there a way of making it work when you are anchored for long periods
of time? Also,is maintainance difficult?
Marc
By Katrina on Sunday, October 14, 2002 - 08:35 pm:
This is a prayer answered, if the Waterlog Watermaker can do what it claims!
Please share your experience with this device. I am writing a term paper on
viable ways of developing a reliable supply of water offshore for my future 30
foot ketch. I am eager to learn as much as possible about this particular
watermaker as I want to buy it.
Waterlog - Hi Marc, They are supposed to be bringing out an accessory motor
drive while at anchor. I`m not sure though that we want to make water near the
shore (many places have dubious water, lots of silt & maybe sewage). Better
go for a sail and make some. (Water, not sewage !).
By Dave on Monday, October 15, 2001 - 05:54 pm:
Maintainance is nothing - plug in a little 1/4 inch tube thing which
recirculates the output, open a tiny powder keg that comes in multi packs and
pour it in. You tow it for 30 seconds and thats it steralized for longer term
storage. We have only pickled it once - take out 3 screws hang it from the boom
and pour in another little keg (different colour for pickle) leave it a couple
of hours and thats it. Simple. No drains pipes valves and buckets to mess with.
As to filters - No tools needed to remove the stainless filter (2 fingers &
5 seconds) if you want to wash it out - well designed for cruisers.
Katina - Don`t hold your breath waiting for water, as it comes out frustratingly
slowly if you sit and watch it, particularly if the boat is going slowly. Forget
about it and next time you look you have a few gallons. But yes, it does what is
claims. The thing is very clever & simple.
If you want 20 gallons per person per day, though, then spend $4000 and get one
of the traditional watermakers and an on-board mechanic to keep it going! We are
happy to swim and then quick shower off. I suspect we could not exist without a
watermaker now. Safe Cruising, Dave
By hrod on Tuesday, October 16,
2002 - 08:14 am:
Dave Hi HROD GREAT !!!!
Is it possible to replace the propeler by an air propeller and so to avoid the
drag. How the Intake water works?
HROD
By Dave on Tuesday, October 16, 2002 - 04:18 pm:
No point in trying because the drag is not such a great problem. Our boat is 38`
and it costs us about one eight of one knot. We met another couple with a 45
footer and they said that there was no measureable speed difference at all.
Oddly, when we have weed on the bottom the drag seems to go up a bit to about a
quarter knot maybe. Anyway, it is nothing at all if there is a decent bit of
wind.
Intake water goes in via tiny stainless gaps running around the pump body and
then through a filter mesh also running around the body. Therefore the filter
(actually there are 3 - arranged in sandwich layers) only takes up about 1/8
inch. Its neat allright. Cheers. Dave
By Grumpy on Wednesday, March 6, 2003 - 08:47 pm:
Finally something I can afford and figure out.
By Joel
on Sunday, March 18, 2003 - 07:07 am:
Has anybody experienced on long ocean passage the loss of a towed water
generator swallowed by big pelagic “creatures”?
It happened!!
Anybody had or heard about same experience with towed water powered watermaker?
By Brent
Hansen on Tuesday, March 18, 2003 - 11:12 am:
We're getting ready for cruising this fall (2003) and would like to know how
the Waterlog has held up - any thoughts out there? (We have a large watertank,
so are leaning towards no water maker at all, but the Waterlog might allow for
easier cruising). Thanks - Brent and Sue
By P Larsson on Friday, September 12, 2003 - 08:33 am:
We got a waterlog model 200 about 18 months back. Good value for money and so far its still good. We think its the only way to go for a small to medium cruiser. Afterwards, we got the 12 v motor for it in harbor although thats a bit of a luxury - just saves going ashor
Sailboat owners forum
Response to What is a good small sailboat watermaker?:Non electric watermaker Hi J.B. I think the 72 gals / day is probably the bigger Waterlog. Ours is
the middle one (a 200) and gives between 20 and 40 gallons / day depending on
speed. We average about 5.5 knots and i suppose it does maybe 1.5 gals hour at
that or 36 gpd. You ask about maintenance. never did any in 3 years now so cant
comment on that. Chuck in a powder of antibiotic if not in use. They sell them
on internet for about $4
sailingclub/postcard
December 19 2002
After
an hour and a half we were able to switch the engine off and gently ghost along
with the sails just filling. By 0700 hours and first light, we had covered
our first 50 miles, but the islands of Gomera and Tenerife (with the 3718 m high
El Teide mountain) were still visible on the horizon. The most southerly
island, Hierro, was off our port beam The
waterlog dutifully worked through the night and by 0300 hours had filled all of
our empty 5 litre plastic water containers. I transferred them into the
boat’s main tanks using a funnel and the deck filler and then restarted to
fill the containers again. However, the production rate tailed off even
though boat speed was more or less the same. It was a damp night and the
seas made the motion a bit rolly, but I was able to sleep a little in the
cockpit between checking for ships, etc. At
1200 our noon fix showed we were making good progress in the fresh breeze. The
water maker seemed to have dried up so we rolled in the genoa and hove-to (to
stop the boat) and pulled in the device. Wrapped around the impellor was a
bit of old rope and fishing line – poor little thing had been trying so hard!
We stowed it onboard and put the rope in the rubbish bag for disposal ashore (Later
in the voyage the watermaker eventually started to produce little and salty
water, indicative of a broken external rubber `O` ring where the tow tube enters
the watermaker allowing much of the output water to escape and let some sea
water in. May have been caused by the pole experiment which would have been
pushing the joint instead of pulling it. The solution to surfacing is to add a
shaft anode as a weight to the tow tube) You may well be correct - I know nothing about them except
what Google told me. Post Extras: The article in "Voile et Voilieres" (Sept 2002
edition) is presented as a hands on test, done on their boat, with
pictures taken by their photographer and so on, and they report their own
findings in terms of throughput, impact on performance etc. It's hard to
believe that a reputable mag would print such an article if it hadn't
actually done the tests. This does suggest that at least one example is in
existence. Waterlog's Product Support Department made the following
comments to me, but apparently do not want to get embroiled personally in
the fora: Well, Antoine Sézérat of Voiles et Voiliers replied to
my e-mail, initially briefly to confirm that the Waterlog existed and was
the best thing since the invention of the GPS, and subsequently at more
length - presumably after looking at this thread. Thats convinced me well enough! I don't want one, not a
lot of use to me to be honest, but my brother is or was certainly
interested, I'll let him know. It's rather puzzling that no UK magazine
has tested a UK product, Hmmmmmm I wonder why. I wonder if Kim could be
persuaded to find out what the story is. They of course may have plans to
do so. Post Extras: Re: Waterlog non-existent? (Longish
post)
Nick, Post Extras:
McGregor sailing forum Re: Help Please - Small Watermaker
Recommendations? I have
been towing my Waterlog Watermaker for the last 12 months without
fault. To the point now I never fill the tanks from the mains anymore. It is
easy to deploy and will Merrily top the tanks from empty. =============== Re: Towed watermakers -anyone tried one yet? Posted: Apr 20, 2005 07:48:17
Submitted by Chris on 03/02/03 at 12:19PM regarding General_interest
Damon and David (bruadair)
Mate
Username:
bruadair
Post Number:
53
Registered:
12-2002
Posted
on Monday, February 23, 2004 - 05:32 pm:
Hi Harley,
A friend of ours left last month on their Endeavour 37 for Mexico. They
bought a waterlog (not sure of which model) just before they left here. In
their update email after their arrival, Darrel said he was real happy with
the unit and its fantastic. He did say, though, that it wasn't feasable to deploy if the
seas were rough. Makes sense. I'll ask him for more details about using
the waterlog next time I talk to him. I've been looking at the unit as
well, seems like a good alternative to standard watermakers out there. Let
me know if you get anymore info on them.
Damon
Re: Watermakers
On the 800 psi point, this manipulation of physics is used by all sorts of
manufacturers, particularly a so-called "pressure spray" device
that used to be sold in many DIY outlets and magazines. Their theory was
that if you make a nozzle small enough, passing a high flow rate through
it can increase the pressure. Like putting your thumb over the end of a
hosepipe. Maybe the Watermaker does the same thing.
Re: Waterlog non-existent? (Longish
post)
That's not to say I believe the claim that it is the best selling
watermaker in the world - far from it - I can't believe that if that were
the case we would not have seen hands on tests in the UK press before now,
but perhaps it does really exist at last.
I want to believe in it - because if it exists it is an elegant solution
which seems vastly superior to the alternatives - but I remain healthily
sceptical.
BTW - I have finally found an address and phone number on their website
too. They are only a couple of miles away from here.
"Thank you very much for your kind advice that there are postings
on the YBW and other forums alleging non-existence of the Waterlog, the
watermaker that needs no electricity or installation."
"The Yachting press in many
countries have described Waterlog as the most significant development for
a sailing vessel since the advent of the tiller pilot or GPS."
"Many of these postings, not only on YBW but on other forums also,
are placed maliciously by people who are in the marine trade and are
agents for other brands of traditional watermakers which do not compare
with the new technology Waterlog. We know who some of these people are and
can identify them. Sadly, although the Internet is a wonderful tool
serving Humankind, it contains more misinformation than truth."
"Further, numerous allegations have appeared that a Mr. ------
ordered a Waterlog and cancelled his order after many months waiting for
it. This is untrue.
Mr. ------ did indeed order one for delivery before his departure in ten
days. He was advised that we could not oblige him as there was a waiting
list for watermakers at that time."
They then refer to various pages on the website and conclude with:
"We do hope that you can now accept that these postings are by
persons who are either wholly ignorant of the facts or are commercially
motivated."
I then had a good trawl around the web and came up with an apparently
satisfied customer from a posting on another board. I e-mailed him and
asked him about his experience with Waterlog, and this was his reply
(which I have just received):
"Hello!"
"I had forgotten about my posting somewhere, I think it was a long
time ago - I don`t go into forums once it dawned on me that they are
populated mainly by foolish people."
"In our view, the most important items aboard a boat that goes
anywhere are the autopilot, the gps, the waterlog and fridge - in that
order. The first three work well but fridges can be a recurring problem.
No doubt it is possible to do without these things but safety &
quality of life aboard is what it is all about."
"The waterlog is excellent and reliable but if your crew expect hot
baths, fit an engine driven watermaker for about an additional $4,000
extra!"
"Best wishes"
"Dave"
So there you have the results of my research. On balance I am inclined to
think that the Waterlog exists and works. If it does, I want one. The rest
of you will have to make up your own minds or pursue your own enquiries.
Nick -
His second e-mail to me is reproduced in full below:
Nick,
I'm back with the waterlog.
Well, I'm devastated reading the thread about the non-existence of this
watermaker. I test it during days and it works very well. Next year we'll
have two boats testing it for a long term. One in Mediterranean for a
medium cruising along the year, another one crossing the Atlantic back
from the West Indies.
The Waterlog is in full production. Actually, it took 8 days to get the
200 and 28 days for the 300. Readers of the magazine ordered the product
and were delivered on time. Sharp.
We had the water tested in a lab : 99,9 % pure ! (in front of Marseilles
and it taste very good, slightly acid but with no minerals)
Funny story. Plastimo, one of the biggest european chandlers and
manufacturers of nautical products ordered one and were very impressed by
the concept !
The guys fromWaterlog wondered why people from Yachting World or other
magazines from the same press group never test it. And they are located
few blocks from them !
Well, you can see photos of the beast in the magazine, underwater and in
the cockpit.
I trust Waterlog and it will be a revolution for the 30-40 foot sailing
boats range.
Best wishes
Antoine Sézérat
That pretty much convinces me . . . and I too wonder why the UK yachting
press haven't rushed to test this. I feel a conspiracy theory coming on.
Antoine's e-mail address is sezerat@voilesetvoiliers.com
if anyone wants to contact him themselves.
Nick -
Re: Waterlog non-existent? (Longish
post)
Yes that convinces me too, actually I'm quite happy to apologise because I
think it sounds a great idea if it works and if it's in production, so
good luck to Waterlog. I'm happy to eat humble pie and just pleased I
never offered to eat my hat!
I don't really want to detract from the sincerity of my apology but I have
to say that I do think Waterlog could have nipped this in the bud
themselves ages ago instead of leaving it to a Froggie magazine to do it
for them.
Full marks for the investigative reporting.
Cheers, Brian.
Talbot
(regular)
01/08/2004 18:17
![]()
Re: watermakers
I have been looking at watermakers for some time now. The cheapest
and lowest running costs is a towed thing called the Waterlog. YW
are doing a test of one right now (although the gentleman doing the
test apparently considers watermakers to be a waste of money). There
have been a number of posts about this towed beast before. A lot of
people (with zero experience of them) are very sceptical. I have
found two adverse comments from users on the web, and quite a few
who like them (particularly in the States). A French magazine has
done a test and was complimentary (see here)
Comments on their performance (see here)
Comparison of different watermakers here
Available from here
I have no connection with the company, but have been active in
trying to get IPC to actually look at it. IMHO the one to go for is
the Waterlog 200, and that is what I will be getting.
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2004 6:28 pm
Post subject:
Steve,
FWIW, if one wanted to try a 30 day cruise to Hawaii, or even just a month
on Sea of Cortez ....
One of last month's sailing mags showed a new watermaker called the Waterlog. It is a stainless cylinder, 3' length
and 3" diameter. Starts at $1,000, makes a gallon per hour of fresh
water as it's towed @ 5 kn. behind the boat on it's 40-foot long delivery
hose. What a terrific Macgregor upgrade, eh? !!!
Spend double for its bigger brother and triple production to 80 gallons
per day, and take showers too! Pump the surplus through a "sweet
water" ballast tank to maintain a continuously upgraded reserve of
200 gallons, just in case .... ain't modern tech simply amazing!!
Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2004 7:39
pm Post subject:
Wow! Forget the insane trip to
Hawaii (I agree with Craig anyway); but this Waterlog
is one of the cleverest concepts ever.
That's really cheap for a watermaker; the cheapest one in the West
Marine catalog is $1679 for a manual only pump model advertized at 1.2
gph. Right, who (other than the governor of California) is going to
manually pump a watermaker for an hour? The Waterlog thing os $1000 and
is self powering but you can also pump it by hand if you want to when it
puts out 1.6 gph in emergency. Thats enough to keep two people in
drinking water for four days.
A couple of drawbacks I see for the Mac: It takes 3.8 knots to start
producing at reduced output, but it doesn't mention what that reduced
output rate is. Optimum is 5 to 6.5 which means the Mac will have to be
close to maxed out under sail for it to work at optimum efficiency. 7.5
knots is stated to be the max safe speed without adding additional
weight, so powering is limited to low speeds.
Another is the optional 12V motor for use when you're anchored or
becalmed.
What does the (theoretically) independent sailing mag have to say about
it?
#836496
- 29/09/2005 00:00
Excellent, throughly recommend!
--------------------
Sorry, not intelligent enough for an opinion! Try down the corridor.
#730770
- 09/05/2005 13:29
Well, I've managed to acquire one and have it on board - so it does really
exist! Mine was sent for the cost of an RNLI donation from a previous
owner who has ended a long sea adventure. By his account, he certainly had
problems with it, mainly to do with the unit not staying under water but
he also spoke of good aftersales experience from the manufacturer. There
is a known fault on this one, with a kink on the boat end of the hose
connector. I also know another user who owns one in the carib and speaks
highly of it. I'm keeping an open mind until I have the chance to fix the
kink and test it in July - will report back.
WaveDancer,
Yes, we own a WaterLog 200 (48 gal/day). We haven't had it long, but have used
it a lot The only draw-back is that when in high, sharp seas it's difficult for it to
perform as well. But when cruising in calmer seas, it performs fine. We like the
versitality of it (you can purchase a motor for it, drag it behind, or purchase
the hand-pump to use in your life raft.) Also, we have heard of some dragging it
behind their dinghies as well. We didn't try that one so we can't tell how to
rig it or how well it does.
Also, they don't have dealers. You ahve to order it directly from them in
England. They keep the cost down for the buyer that way. By the way, we had ours
shipped by DHL. At the time we had ours shipped DHL didn't do well. The box was
in seriously bad condition. I would request another shipper, or insure the
shipping. Still, all of our parts were there, nothing missing or damaged.
The other great thing about the WaterLog is not having to pickle it all the
time. If you aren't going to use it for a while, just do as they instruct before
storing it. Then don't keep the first few gallons, allowing it to flush out the
next time you use it.
Hope this helps you and answers a few questions.
Fair winds,
CJS